As a landscape, the undecidability (visual ambiguity arising from simulation) of virtual space is initially a question of the (event) horizon [that both bounds and exceeds the eye]. Like other landscapes, the stealth landscape is composed of atmospheres and terrains. The stealth body in the stealth landscape, as the fruition of Futurist agenda of speed and vectorial bodies, generates ambiguities of distance and position. The landscape of negation both slides from beneath and exceeds the pastoral lands cape tradition, as it does the urban tradition.1 http://noel.pd.org/topos/theory/sprawl-frame.html
Stealth is a disappearance in some way
there was no reflective surface facing you
computer games are creating stealth landscapes
he is there but he is not there
lost highway
trying to build these technologies into psychoanalysis
you can be a formalist and not give a shit about painting
going back and forwards
back to interacting with the screen
Stealth posits a mutable and deliberate relation between what is revealed and what is concealed, where one appears as opposed to where one is projected (both positionally and conceptually). Not an obscuring architecture, it should be a sophisticated response to aesthetics of disappearance. The stealth landscape engages assemblages and techniques of concealment and erasure derived from (stealth) technology (insofar as all technology is stealth technology).2 http://noel.pd.org/topos/theory/sprawl-frame.html
questions of perception
multiple perspectives and multiple points of view
art work exist outside the role of the artist
new york cyclist strategy you can do anything you like as long as you don't get hit
social construction
how we turn it (art) into a pro active
museum technologies
making the thoughts applied
we've hit the screen
there has to be a way beyond the postmodern - modern polemic
when art is still born
there is no object that is still born
if it is not recognised or ignored
work has the potential of being
news group
terminus is not a bus stop its a way of life
why we like art and why we do what we do
context is more important than content
y generation when they dont want to know to much
genteration below us are over stimulated
we come hack to Perth it is the problem with Perth
what we were talking about were people in general
installation was the first attempt to get the work of the wall to become more interactive
there is no longer a paternal interaction
The convergence of computers and communications is producing an environment, a telematic culture, in which many cherished institutions and artistic practices are feeling challenged, threatened, or just plain redundant, as exemplified not least of all by that triumph of ideological instrumentality, the museum. The cyberstress that the new technologies and new media exert upon the Culture of Representation is felt as much at the larger political level as it is in individual, personal experience. The impact of telepresence, bionic diversity, distributed knowledge, collaborative creativity, and artificial life on our sense of self, our sense of what is natural, what it is to be human, indeed of the status and legitimacy of every day reality, is more than most traditional discourses can bear. The breaking point however is not the death of culture or the incoherence of consciousness but the revitalisation of our whole state of being and a renewal of the conditions and construction of what we choose to call reality.3 http://www.ntticc.or.jp/pub/ic_mag/ic015/ascott/ascott_e.html
museum is hard of hearing in connection with this article
he is dealing with a delivery of apparitions
historically what I find interesting by the museum in WA
combined with the art gallery
art with stuffed birds
art and museum were split
social control by calling it a museum
if it falls into the wrong hand
it already has
the shear mass of information about the museum is going to totally contradict what the culturally directed museum states
arbiters of taste
backlit
the possibility of being seen
people can interact nobody knows were it is going to go
but the interaction from
national museum
virtual museum
art is not PC
culturally there is a consciousness with the border of the skin
you are no better than a dog end on your shoe
lost faith in the process
destroy the image
the soils just sand
It just didn't feel right
the bubble burst
there wasn't any body who knew they wern't Pollocks
1970 Perth two years for importing a flase vemeer
homo aestheticus
Many proponents of postmodernism stress that theirs is not just one more 'ism' but instead represents a radical change of consciousness that throws into question Western society's 'modernist ideology of the exalted and redemptive character of art. By their critical examination of the orthodox, established assumption that art is inviolable and sacred, and by their discovery that orthodoxy has often masked repressive or narrow minded elitism, postmodern theorists have opened the door to a new consideration of the place that art has had or might have in human life.4
Darwinian basis for the value of aesthetics
postmodernists dilutes aesthetics, through commodification can aesthetics be linked to artists as directly as aesthetics to art
is postmodernist art not challenging because it is inexplicably linked to modes of capitalism
The prority for Art & Language at that time was work in and at the interfaces between philoshophy of mind, the philosophy of language, epistemology, cognitive psychology, cybernetics, etc - much of which by the early 80s had been sort of pulled together under the titles of cognitive science and artifical intelligence.5
managerial restoration of the visual
trying to create an history, or rather an interpretation of an history that is non negotiable
web site is a site of production,
the information upon the site is essentially documentation
negotiating the space between the screen and the hardware is perhaps more at stake than swapping information with another person
the site is about making a critical environment which is both of this place and practically anywhere
the way the group is growing is almost biological, with an inbuilt connectivity through the tools that we have chosen
1.http://noel.pd.org/topos/theory/sprawl-frame.html
2.http://noel.pd.org/topos/theory/sprawl-frame.html
3.http://caiiamind.nsad.gwent.ac.uk/cyberception.html
4. .............................., Homo Aestheticus, preface p15
5. Terry Atkinson, The Siren Song of Dualism, Art Monthly Nov 96 UK
Terminus = Paul Thomas Mark Cypher David Carson Brian Mckay Jeff Jones Barbara Bolt Theo Koning Jeremy Blank Alex Spremberg
INTRODUCTION
MEETINGS.
ARTISTS
E-Mail: p.thomas@curtin.edu.au
Terminus=
|